Negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and other processes of dispute resolution.
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label arbitration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label arbitration. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 7, 2017
Arbitration in New York
Friday, October 7, 2016
My New Book on Arbitration, Negotiation, Mediation and Other Process of ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution)
Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution (3d edition, 2016) is a clear and reliable statement of the law and concepts central to ADR (arbitration, negotiation, mediation, and other processes).
Available from the publisher, West Academic
and on Kindle from Amazon
Available from the publisher, West Academic
and on Kindle from Amazon
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Collection of Alternative Dispute Resolution Course Syllabi Linked
University of Missouri Law Professor John Lande updated this excellent collection of syllabi for courses including Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration, Comparative and International Dispute Resolution, Mediation and Negotiation.
Thanks also to John for his pleasant and insightful dinner conversation a few days ago. ;-)
Thanks also to John for his pleasant and insightful dinner conversation a few days ago. ;-)
Labels:
ADR,
alternative dispute resolution,
arbitration,
international dispute resolution,
John Lande,
mediation,
negotiation,
syllabi,
teaching ADR,
teaching mediation,
teaching negotiation
Location:
Lawrence, KS 66049, USA
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Negotiation, Mediation, and Arbitration) on Twitter
This very helpful list of Twitter feeds compiled by
J. Haskell Murray, J.D.
Assistant Professor of Management
and Business Law
Belmont University
1900 Belmont Boulevard
Jack C. Massey Business Center,
Office 438
Nashville, Tennessee 37212
Phone: 615-460-6395
Labels:
ADR,
arbitration,
mediation,
negotiation,
Twitter
Location:
Lawrence, KS 66049, USA
Monday, July 14, 2014
Online Mediation and Online Arbitration
Teaching online dispute resolution through a simulation exercise by Noam Ebner of Creighton University School of Law's Werner Institute for Negotiation and Dispute Resolution. His abstract:
BeatleMania! is a simulation for studying and experiencing online dispute resolution. Two parties to an eBay transaction gone awry, regarding the sale of Beatles memorabilia, set out to resolve their differences with the assistance of a third party mediator.
This simulation is structured to allow communication to be conducted though any online medium selected jointly by the parties and mediators. In other words, the storyline supports this mediation being conducted via email, videoconferencing or other media. teachers can instruct students regarding use of specific media, if they prefer to focus on a particular medium.
Also, I recently learned about equibbly which advertises:
Avoid the Nightmare of Going to Court
Have a former Court Judge decide your case online in under two weeks
Save time and money. Using eQuibbly is quicker, cheaper and more convenient than going to small claims court to settle your dispute.
BeatleMania! is a simulation for studying and experiencing online dispute resolution. Two parties to an eBay transaction gone awry, regarding the sale of Beatles memorabilia, set out to resolve their differences with the assistance of a third party mediator.
This simulation is structured to allow communication to be conducted though any online medium selected jointly by the parties and mediators. In other words, the storyline supports this mediation being conducted via email, videoconferencing or other media. teachers can instruct students regarding use of specific media, if they prefer to focus on a particular medium.
Also, I recently learned about equibbly which advertises:
Avoid the Nightmare of Going to Court
Have a former Court Judge decide your case online in under two weeks
Save time and money. Using eQuibbly is quicker, cheaper and more convenient than going to small claims court to settle your dispute.
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Gender Differences in Dispute Resolution Practice
Gina Brown and Marquette Law Professor Andrea Schneider report survey results: "certain practice areas are far more male and certain others are quite female. Second, it appears to matter how the neutral is selected in mediation. Networking resulted in only 29% women while provider lists resulted in an increased percentage of 47%. Finally, arbitration and mediation are not the same for gender integration. Arbitration seems to hold steady at 20% regardless of selection process and even decreases further in panel arbitrations."
Among their recommendations: "in three arbitrator panels, when considering equally qualified candidates, there should be a presumption that a woman be selected as part of a panel. Furthermore, neutrals need to be aware that personal networks still appear to be the primary source of referrals and that these networks need to be strengthened and broadened to include women.... Courts, provider organizations, agencies, and other organizations that administer and oversee ADR programs should be encouraged to use lists and the lists themselves should be broadened to include more women. ... Additional efforts in certain practice areas (commercial, construction, etc.) are likely warranted with a targeted program to identify and encourage women and minorities to serve as neutrals."
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
ADR and Class Actions
Although (or perhaps because) this article fits in the Journal of Tort Law it offers a useful perspective on the similarities between ADR and class actions and what may be the hottest issue in arbitration law--whether to enforce arbitration clauses that relinquish the right to proceed on a class, rather than individual, basis.
The article is "Settlement, ADR, and Class Action Superiority" by Houston Law Prof D Theodore Rave
The article is "Settlement, ADR, and Class Action Superiority" by Houston Law Prof D Theodore Rave
Thursday, January 23, 2014
The Psychology of Procedural Preference: How Litigants Evaluate Legal Procedures Ex Ante
UC Davis Law Professor Donna Shestowsky's PhD in psychology along with her law degree enable her to do a lot of interesting research on ADR. She surveys civil litigants at the start of their cases and finds that litigants like mediation, bench trial, and negotiations with both lawyers and clients present. She also finds, as Andrea Schneider puts it, that "Repeat players – those who had been either a defendant or plaintiff in a prior case – liked the idea of using binding arbitration for their case more than first-time litigants. 'This finding resonates with the idea that repeat litigants are more likely than first-time litigants to appreciate the fact that trials are often associated with painful, protracted discovery and the threat of an appeal.'”
Saturday, October 5, 2013
ADR Prof Blog
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution on Google Books and Amazon
Friday, September 27, 2013
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
ADR in cyberspace
Ware, Stephen J. and Rudolph Cole, Sarah, ADR in Cyberspace. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=993448 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=993448
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)