Realizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial Mediation, by University of Missouri Law Professor S.I. Strong, is forthcoming in the Washington and Lee Law Review.
The abstract says "Numerous public and private entities have launched initiatives to encourage mediation in international commercial and investment disputes, and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has taken up a proposal from the U.S. Government to consider whether a new treaty involving international commercial mediation is warranted."
Professor Strong's article "analyzes findings from the first-ever large-scale empirical study on international commercial mediation, providing hard data about current behaviors, beliefs and practices and testing fundamental theories about the use, nature and future of this particular process."
Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution, in its fourth edition, is a Concise Hornbook, published by West Academic. More information is available by clicking on the photo.
Showing posts with label ADR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ADR. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 19, 2017
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Collection of Alternative Dispute Resolution Course Syllabi Linked
University of Missouri Law Professor John Lande updated this excellent collection of syllabi for courses including Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration, Comparative and International Dispute Resolution, Mediation and Negotiation.
Thanks also to John for his pleasant and insightful dinner conversation a few days ago. ;-)
Thanks also to John for his pleasant and insightful dinner conversation a few days ago. ;-)
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Negotiation, Mediation, and Arbitration) on Twitter
This very helpful list of Twitter feeds compiled by
J. Haskell Murray, J.D.
Assistant Professor of Management
and Business Law
Belmont University
1900 Belmont Boulevard
Jack C. Massey Business Center,
Office 438
Nashville, Tennessee 37212
Phone: 615-460-6395
Monday, October 13, 2014
Wikipedia Alternative Dispute Resolution
Your Day in 'Wiki-Court': ADR, Fairness, and Justice in Wikipedia's Global Community by
York University - Osgoode Hall Law Professor Sara Ross.
The abstract:
Wikipedia has quickly become the largest volume of collected knowledge on the planet, but it is also one of the busiest centers for dispute resolution in the world. From small groups of individuals negotiating article changes on “talk pages”, to the involvement of hundreds of people in the formation of the community consensuses needed to implement new policies, to the use of binding arbitration to create final conflict resolutions, the Wikipedia community has developed a complex network of norms and rules that funnel all disagreements and intractable differences through a series of progressively more involved dispute resolution processes. I provide an overview and analysis of the dispute resolution processes used by the community and will look to the successes and limitation of these processes. A number of flaws will be identified including the ability for vocal minorities to dominate the Wikipedia community consensus. A systemic bias will be identified in the behavioural landscape of the community and, finally, it will become apparent that there is room for growth in the website’s inclusiveness, primarily through addressing the logistical realities of a potential user’s access to the time, materials, and knowledge needed to become a contributing member of the Wikipedia community.
York University - Osgoode Hall Law Professor Sara Ross.
The abstract:
Wikipedia has quickly become the largest volume of collected knowledge on the planet, but it is also one of the busiest centers for dispute resolution in the world. From small groups of individuals negotiating article changes on “talk pages”, to the involvement of hundreds of people in the formation of the community consensuses needed to implement new policies, to the use of binding arbitration to create final conflict resolutions, the Wikipedia community has developed a complex network of norms and rules that funnel all disagreements and intractable differences through a series of progressively more involved dispute resolution processes. I provide an overview and analysis of the dispute resolution processes used by the community and will look to the successes and limitation of these processes. A number of flaws will be identified including the ability for vocal minorities to dominate the Wikipedia community consensus. A systemic bias will be identified in the behavioural landscape of the community and, finally, it will become apparent that there is room for growth in the website’s inclusiveness, primarily through addressing the logistical realities of a potential user’s access to the time, materials, and knowledge needed to become a contributing member of the Wikipedia community.
Saturday, October 5, 2013
ADR Prof Blog
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution on Google Books and Amazon
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
ADR in cyberspace
Ware, Stephen J. and Rudolph Cole, Sarah, ADR in Cyberspace. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=993448 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=993448
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)